Visit Our Newest Feature - The Teams Page
Find about all about your favorite team including Stats Leaders, Awards, Playoff Teams, and More . . .



Smokey Joe Wood and Spud Chandler
by Asher B. Chancey, Baseball Evolution
January 26, 2006



It is with a smarmy smirk on my face that I note the inconsistency with which Scott and Keith treated Smokey Joe Wood and Spud Chandler. These two fellas are similar in my mind because a) they both had very high winning percentages, b) they both had excellent ERAs, and c) they both only managed to accumulate about 1400 innings pitched. Wood has the advantage in ERA+ (146 vs. 132), wins (117 vs. 109) and K/BB (989/421 vs. 614/463), while Chandler has the edge in innings pitched (by 48.6 innings) and winning percentage (.717 vs. .672). They were essentially the same pitcher.

Wood's career got off to a very quick start, but injuries basically ended his career at the age of 25 it is just remarkable that he did what he did in the time he did it in. He actually was pretty solid later in his career as an outfielder, but it doesn't add to his credentials significantly.

Chandler got off to a very late start. He debuted at the age of 29, but he was 34 before he pitched 200 innings in a season. Then, he missed most of 1944 and 1945 due to the war.

For my part, I was very enamored with both of these guys, and shot them straight twos. I know they didn't last long, and extended success is preferable to temporary success. Fernando Valenzuela, Dwight Gooden, and Dave Stewart might all be in the Hall if their careers had been derailed like Wood or gotten off to a late start like Chandler. Nevertheless, I found them both to be impressive, and voted for them both.

I can absolutely see both Scott and Keith arguing with me on these two players. But I can not really picture Scott or Keith arguing with me on one player but not the other. Despite this, Scott and Keith each gave one of these players a two and the other one a zero. Humorously, they disagreed on who got what. Keith hit Wood with a 0 while tagging Chandler with a 2, and Scott did the opposite.

For my part, I do think Wood was slightly better than Chandler, but I really can't imagine how either Scott of Keith justifies thinking one of these guys in an absolute pick for the Hall while the other one is absolutely not. It is inconsistency at its best.


Become A Sponsor of BaseballEvolution.com
Sponsor a page at BaseballEvolution.com. On a page of your choice, you can place a personalized message, a tribute to a player, or a link to your website!



Disagree with something? Got something to add? Wanna bring up something totally new? Asher B. Chancey resides in Alexandria, Virginia, and can be reached at asher@baseballevolution.com.


Baseball Evolution Features

The Teams Page
Find about all about your favorite team.

Splitsville
All kinds of split statistics and what they mean.

Statistics
Your source for stats, conventional and otherwise.

Award Room
All of your award info and analysis right here.

News and Notes
Interesting odds and ends from around the league.

Top 100s
See where we rank'em.

Trivia
Test your baseball knowledge.

Predictions
As the season rolls along, check to see how accurate our 2005 predictions were.

Boneheads
See who's making a lot of money to embarrass themselves writing about baseball.

Heated Debates
We don't always agree with each other.

Scorer's Corner
Keith shares scoring oddities that he has encountered.

Player Nicknames
How we refer to certain players when we're discussing them.

Ballpark Food
What various ballparks around the league should be serving up to the fans.

Scouting Reports
In-depth analysis of high-level prospects.

The Name Game
Put your skills to the test.